Email Us

Pros and Cons of Centralized Vs. Decentralized Translation

So, which approach, centralized or decentralized, offers the most advantages, and what are their respective drawbacks? Let's explore these dimensions in the sections to follow.

Communication Efficiency

Comparing centralized and decentralized management, decentralized approaches eliminate intermediary communication layers, enhancing communication efficiency. In a decentralized model, requesters can convey their specific needs, background information, reference information, and any other critical details directly to the suppliers. Suppliers can likewise address project issues directly with the requesters, and since there are typically no time zone differences, rapid responses to queries are achievable.

Service Quality

In a centralized management model, participants in the globalization team possess in-depth knowledge of language translation and are experts in the field. They establish quality standards, track translation projects, and monitor quality scores objectively. Based on these quality scores, quality management of suppliers is implemented, resulting in effective quality assurance and long-term stability in translation quality.

In contrast, in the decentralized model, quality management becomes a challenge. Those involved in translation projects, whether pharmaceutical or medical device registration applicants or local company supplier management personnel, typically lack expertise in translation. This can lead to varying interpretations of translation quality, resulting in inconsistent translation quality and higher quality risks.

In summary, the quality in centralized management is superior to that in decentralized management.

Language Assets

Language assets generally encompass Translation Memories, Terminology, Translation Style Guides, Bilingual Files, and other resources used for translation management and post-translation maintenance. These assets are crucial for maintaining translation quality, reducing translation costs, and establishing a consistent translation style. To leverage the benefits of language assets, meticulous maintenance and management are required.


In centralized management, the language assets are managed by the globalization team. However, in a decentralized management model, usually, nobody is responsible for these assets, and many people may not even be familiar with these terms.


Over the years, various translation technologies, such as Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT), Translation Management Systems (TMS), Machine Translation (MT), and Quality Assurance (QA) tools, have been successfully integrated into the translation process. With their implementation, the efficiency of translation and management has significantly improved. Companies that have successfully introduced new technologies into translation management have greatly benefited from them.

In this aspect, centralized management possesses inherent advantages. It can efficiently manage the entire company's translation needs, allocate dedicated personnel for research and development of technology, and gradually apply these advancements to their translation projects.

Decentralized management, on the other hand, faces significant challenges in implementing these technological tools. For example, a company headquarters may purchase a TMS software and integrate it into the company's server, requiring local offices to manage their translation projects in the TMS. However, since translation management is decentralized, there is no strong control by the headquarters. Local requesters still contact their suppliers offline to request quotes, schedule work, and submit translations. Only project information is recorded in the TMS after the project is completed. This can result in the investment in purchasing the TMS being less effective.

Regarding the trend of technology in translation, we have observed that:

l It is still a hot topic to effectively integrate existing technologies into a company's translation process.

l Exploring the application of new AIGC technology in translation to save costs.

In any case, the implementation of technology requires strong control across languages, which depends on centralized management.

What Works for You

After this comprehensive comparison, it becomes evident that both models have their distinctive characteristics. Generally, decentralized management is suitable for single language, irregular requirements, and when no language experts are involved in management. On the other hand, centralized management works well for multilingual, regular translations, and when long-term management benefits are expected.

Which model is more suitable for your enterprise also depends on various factors, such as your current priorities, budgets, talent teams, and technology support. If you'd like to gain further insights tailored to your specific situation, please don't hesitate to reach out to us at

Related Translation Solutions & Service
Willingjet's Information
1 The Impact of Multimedia Translation in Video Games
Video games have become one of the most popular forms of entertainment in recent years. With immersive storytelling and captivating visuals, they have become a medium that transcends cultural and lang...
Read More
2 The Critical Role of Medical Record Translation in Cross-Border Healthcare
In the rapidly evolving landscape of global healthcare, one of the most significant challenges that healthcare providers face is ensuring effective communication and understanding of medical records a...
Read More
3 Things You Need to Know about Multilingual DTP
The multilingual DTP typesets the layout of publications using specialized typesetting software. With the development of globalization, multilingual DTP is becoming increasingly important, this articl...
Read More